Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • ,
  • Nicole M. Castillo-Huerta
    ,
  • Juan Vivanco-Suarez
    ,
  • Martha I. Vilca-Salas
    ,
  • Diego Bustamante-Paytan
    ,
  • Nagheli Fernanda Borjas-Calderón
  • ,
  • Universidad de San Martin de Porres
    ,
  • School of Medicine
    ,
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    ,
  • Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias
    ,
  • Abdulrauf University of Neurosurgery
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 659-667 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Neuroradiology Journal (Volume 38, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2025
  • Published - 12/2025

Publication status

Published - 12/2025

ISSN

1971-4009

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85216794447

Abstract

Background: The Woven EndoBridge 17 (WEB-17) is the latest advancement in the WEB device family. Comprehensive data on its occlusion rates, procedural complications, and mortality is lacking. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the WEB-17 device in intracranial aneurysms (IAs). Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted from inception to October 2023 across four databases for studies on IAs treated with WEB 17. Primary outcomes included adequate angiographic occlusion at last follow-up and a composite of intraprocedural and postprocedural complications. Comparative meta-analysis between WEB-17 and its predecessor versions (pvWEB) was performed. Subgroup analyses by IA rupture status were also conducted for the primary outcomes. Results: Eleven studies with 880 patients and 933 IAs were included. Regarding efficacy, the rate of adequate occlusion at last follow-up was 91% (95% CI 86%–94%) and the complete occlusion rate was 69% (95% CI 65%–73%). Safety outcomes demonstrated a composite complication rate of 7% (95% CI 4%–11%), an intraprocedural complication rate of 7% (95% CI 5%–9%; I2 = 0%), and a postprocedural complication rate of 2% (95% CI 1%–5%; I2 = 0%). No differences were found between WEB-17 and pvWEB in terms of adequate occlusion (WEB-17: 87.7% vs pvWEB: 80.4%; OR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.71-2.55) and safety composite outcome (WEB-17: 8.7% vs pvWEB: 10%; OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.51-2.16). Subgroup analysis did not evidence heterogeneity between subgroups. Conclusions: The WEB-17 device demonstrates promising efficacy and safety profiles for the treatment of IAs. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the limited quality of evidence in the included studies. Further prospective, randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.