What Historical Records Teach Us about the Discovery of Quinine
- Louis H. Miller(corresponding author),
- ,
- Leanne M. Low,
- Gilberto Corbellini
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID),
- Universidad Privada del Norte,
- Sapienza Università di Roma
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 7-11 (5 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Volume 108, Issue 1)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/2023
Publication status
ISSN
0002-9637Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85146193166
- PubMed: 36410328
Abstract
The origin of quinine from Peru remains a mystery because of the lack of primary data-in particular, those produced by the Jesuits working in Peru. The discovery of cinchona bark and its use in malaria treatment must have come from the Jesuits, who worked with the native Andeans, the Quichuan people, and learned how the bark of the cinchona tree could be used for chills. Unknown is whether the Andean people used it for fever that may have been the result of malaria. We explored the literature of the 1600s, 1700s, and later to trace the history of quinine that is available. All these secondary sources lack the primary data of the Jesuits in their work with native Andeans, nor is there information on how the discovery of its use for malaria-like fevers came about. One clue comes from the Jesuits who talked with the Andean people and learned about quinine. But was it used for fever? Why did the Jesuits test it against (tertian or quartan) fevers that could have been the result of malaria? The gap in our knowledge can only be resolved with the discovery of written documents by the Jesuits about quinine for malaria.
Funding Details
Access to documents
Publication metrics
Metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 3 Good Health and Well
