Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Visibility and impact of the cuban dental scientific output, scopus 1995-2017

  • Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Granma
    ,
  • Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 129-141 (13 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Oral Research (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 30/04/2020

Publication status

Published - 30/04/2020

ISSN

0719-2460

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85086325246

Abstract

Aim: To identify the differences between Cuban scientific research published in highly visible journals and the rest of the national dental scientific output. Materials and Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using 1995-2017 data from the Scopus data-base. The following search strategy was used: country (Cuba), subject area (dentistry), publication source (Journals), article type (Original Research, Review Article). Bibliometric indicators of output, visibility, leadership, collaboration and impact were examined. Result: 521 articles were published in 21 Journals, of which 20 are international and 13 are within the first quartile (Q1), led by Clinical Oral Implants Research. There was a prevalence of Spanish language publications, without collaboration, and in Revista Cubana de Estomatología. The Cuban scientific leadership significantly diminishes in the journals located in the highest visibility quartile (Q1) (p=0.0144). The high dependency of citation-based indicators, as well as international collaboration, in rela-tion to the journals’ quartile, was confirmed. Conclusion: The national scientific output in first quartile journals that has the biggest influence on the scientific international community is dependent on international collaboration to reach high levels of visibility and impact, and the national scientific output is not still able to systematically generate research that impacts in a significant way the scientific international community.