Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Using GRADE methodology for the development of public health guidelines for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other STIs among men who have sex with men and transgender people

  • Elie A. Akl
    ,
  • Caitlin Kennedy
    ,
  • Kelika Konda
    ,
  • Carlos F. Caceres
    ,
  • Tara Horvath
    ,
  • George Ayala
  • McMaster University
    ,
  • State University of New York at Buffalo
    ,
  • Johns Hopkins University
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • University of California, San Francisco
    ,
  • Global Forum on MSM and HIV
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

386

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

BMC Public Health (Volume 12, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2012

Publication status

Published - 2012

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84861439815
  • PubMed: 22640260

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) Department of HIV/AIDS led the development of public health guidelines for delivering an evidence-based, essential package of interventions for the prevention and treatment of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of this paper is to review the methodological challenges faced and solutions applied during the development of the guidelines. Methods. The development of the guidelines followed the WHO guideline development process, which utilizes the GRADE approach. We identified, categorized and labeled the challenges identified in the guidelines development process and described the solutions through an interactive process of in-person and electronic communication. Results: We describe how we dealt with the following challenges: (1) heterogeneous and complex interventions; (2) paucity of trial data; (3) selecting outcomes of interest; (4) using indirect evidence; (5) integrating values and preferences; (6) considering resource use; (7) addressing social and legal barriers; (8) wording of recommendations; and (9) developing global guidelines. Conclusion: We were able to successfully apply the GRADE approach for developing recommendations for public health interventions. Applying the general principles of the approach while carefully considering specific challenges can enhance both the process and the outcome of guideline development.

Funding Details

The development of the guidelines was funded by German BACKUP Initiative, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) with funds from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) and the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
FundersFunding numbers
German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development
-
CDC
-
NICHD
R25HD045810
USAID
-
PEPFAR
-
BMZ
-
GIZ
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
24
Captures
295
Social media
7

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well