Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Three-dimensional condyle and glenoid fossa alterations after class II treatment with twin block and herbst functional appliances - A randomized clinical trial

  • ,
  • Felipe De Assis Ribeiro Carvalho
    ,
  • Jose Augusto Mendes Miguel
    ,
  • Klaus Barreto Dos Santos Lopes Batista
    ,
  • Luciana Quintanilha Pires Fernandes(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Daniel José Blanco-Victorio
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of the State of Rio de Janeiro
    ,
  • Department of Orthodontics
    ,
  • Universidad Señor de Sipán
    ,
  • Dartment of Medicine
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

cjaf038

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

European Journal of Orthodontics (Volume 47, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/08/2025

Publication status

Published - 01/08/2025

ISSN

0141-5387

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105013057490
  • PubMed: 40795311

Abstract

Background Functional appliances, such as Twin Block and Herbst, produce dental and skeletal effects to correct Class II division 1 malocclusion. Although widely studied, there are no prospective randomized studies in the literature evaluating the effects of these appliances on the condyle (CO) and glenoid fossa (GF). Objective To evaluate the differences in the CO and GF after treatment using Twin Block (TB) and Herbst (HB) functional appliances for skeletal Class II malocclusions. Trial design A single-center, two-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods The sample consisted of 24 patients (12 in the TB group, 11.9 ± 1 year; 12 in the HB group, 12.5 ± 1.8 years) with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were recorded before (T0) and after (T1) treatment (12 months). Superimpositions were performed on Dolphin Imaging software, and partial 3D models of CO and GF were segmented in ITK-SNAP software. A coordinate system (X, Y, and Z axes) was created using Geomagic Qualify software in each 3D T0 model. CO and GF models were aligned in the 3D T0 and T1 models. A 3D centroid point was generated between T0 and T1 in each CO and GF. Results The TB group showed posterior growth in the right CO (1.3 mm), left CO (1.3 mm), right GF (0.8 mm), and left GF (0.4 mm). The HB group showed posterior growth in the right CO (1.4 mm), left CO (1.7 mm), right GF (0.1 mm), and left GF (0.1 mm). Limitations As the operator and patients were aware of the type of functional appliance, blinding could be performed only to assess and measure the CBCT exams. Conclusions In both groups, CO and GF grew posteriorly; CO grew vertically in the superior direction, and GF in the inferior direction. The effects on CO and GF were similar when using TB or HB. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02411812). It was registered before commencement.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
5
Mentions
1
Captures
15