Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The influence of flap design on patients’ experiencing pain, swelling, and trismus after mandibular third molar surgery: A scoping systematic review

  • Gennaro DE MARCO
    ,
  • Alessandro Lanza
    ,
  • Corina M. Cristache
    ,
  • Estefani B. Capcha
    ,
  • Karen I. Espinoza
    ,
  • Rosario Rullo
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Campania University Luigi Vanvitelli
    ,
  • Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad de Chile
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e20200932

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Applied Oral Science (Volume 29)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2021

Publication status

Published - 2021

ISSN

1678-7757

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85107940388
  • PubMed: 34105693

Abstract

Third molar removal surgery usually comes accompanied by postoperative discomfort, which could be influenced by the surgical approach chosen. This scoping systematic review aimed at compiling the available evidence focused on the influence of flap design, including envelope flap (EF), triangular flap (TF), and modified triangular flap (MTF), on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus, as primary outcome measures, and any result mentioning healing promotion or delay, as secondary outcome measure, after mandibular third molar extraction surgery. An electronic search, complemented by a manual search, of articles published from 1999 to 2020 was conducted in the Medline (PubMed), EMBASE and Web of Science databases including human randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies with at least 15 patients. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed either with the Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool or with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Every step of the review was performed independently and in duplicate. The initial electronic search recovered 2102 articles. After applying the inclusion criteria, 12 articles were included. For patient’s perceived postoperative pain, TF and MTF frequently reported better results than EF. For swelling, the literature is divided, despite a trend favoring EF. For trismus, data showed that its occurrence is mostly associated with the duration of the surgery rather than with the chosen flap. For healing, the limited data is inconclusive. Finally, randomized studies showed a high risk of bias, whereas nonrandomized studies were mostly of good quality and low risk of bias. Although there was no clear consensus regarding the influence of different flap designs for third mandibular molar extraction on postoperative clinical morbidities; the surgeon’s experience, estimated surgical difficulty, molar position and orientation, and surg ery duration should be considered when choosing among the different flap designs.

Funding Details

EAC was a recipient of a PhD Scholarship from the Graduate School of the Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile.
FundersFunding numbers
Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
9
Captures
52
Usage
407