Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The Influence of a Flexible Model on the Marginal Adaptation of Inlay Composite Restorations: A MicroCT Analysis

  • Mayra V. Villanueva
    ,
  • Gabriela D.S. Balbinot
    ,
  • Gustavo H. Mogollon
    ,
  • Vicente C.B. Leitune
    ,
  • Fabrício M. Collares
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 200-206 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry (Volume 30, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2022

Publication status

Published - 09/2022

ISSN

0965-7452

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85137138457
  • PubMed: 34982864

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of flexible models on the marginal adaptation of indirect resin composite restorations. Thirty-six cavity preparations were made for class II restorations in permanent molar teeth. Three groups (n=12) were defined following three impressions/model material combinations: G(STONE), polyvinylsiloxane, and type IV stone model, as a control group; G(IMPRESSIONPVS), alginate and flexible polyvinylsiloxane; G(MODELPVS), alginate and flexible polyvinylsiloxane for models. All restorations were positioned on their respective teeth and evaluated by micro-computed tomography. Absolute marginal discrepancies were measured digitally (ImageJ). The results were compared using one-way ANOVA (p< 0.05). The mean ± SD absolute marginal discrepancy of indirect resin composite restorations made from flexible and rigid stone models was as follows: G(STONE), 206 (±79.95) µm; G(IMPRESSIONPVS), 221.50 (±61.73) µm; G(MODELPVS), 203.25 (±65.93) µm. Absolute marginal discrepancies were not significantly influenced by the flexible and rigid stone models (p=0.78). The flexible or rigid stone model did not influence the marginal adaptation of the indirect resin composite restorations.