Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

The impact of clinical genome sequencing in a global population with suspected rare genetic disease

  • Erin Thorpe
    ,
  • Taylor Williams
    ,
  • Chad Shaw
    ,
  • Evgenii Chekalin
    ,
  • Julia Ortega
    ,
  • Keisha Robinson
  • Illumina, Inc.
    ,
  • Genetic and Genomic Services PBC
    ,
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    ,
  • Rice University
    ,
  • C2N Diagnostics
    ,
  • Rady Children's Hospital
Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Article Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1271-1281 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

American Journal of Human Genetics (Volume 111, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2024
  • Published - 11/07/2024

Publication status

Published - 11/07/2024

ISSN

0002-9297

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85197069117
  • PubMed: 38843839

Abstract

There is mounting evidence of the value of clinical genome sequencing (cGS) in individuals with suspected rare genetic disease (RGD), but cGS performance and impact on clinical care in a diverse population drawn from both high-income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) has not been investigated. The iHope program, a philanthropic cGS initiative, established a network of 24 clinical sites in eight countries through which it provided cGS to individuals with signs or symptoms of an RGD and constrained access to molecular testing. A total of 1,004 individuals (median age, 6.5 years; 53.5% male) with diverse ancestral backgrounds (51.8% non-majority European) were assessed from June 2016 to September 2021. The diagnostic yield of cGS was 41.4% (416/1,004), with individuals from LMIC sites 1.7 times more likely to receive a positive test result compared to HIC sites (LMIC 56.5% [195/345] vs. HIC 33.5% [221/659], OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9–3.4, p < 0.0001). A change in diagnostic evaluation occurred in 76.9% (514/668) of individuals. Change of management, inclusive of specialty referrals, imaging and testing, therapeutic interventions, and palliative care, was reported in 41.4% (285/694) of individuals, which increased to 69.2% (480/694) when genetic counseling and avoidance of additional testing were also included. Individuals from LMIC sites were as likely as their HIC counterparts to experience a change in diagnostic evaluation (OR 6.1, 95% CI 1.1–∞, p = 0.05) and change of management (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.5–1.3, p = 0.49). Increased access to genomic testing may support diagnostic equity and the reduction of global health care disparities.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
10
Usage
19
Captures
26
Mentions
10