Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Tear biomarkers and corneal sensitivity as an indicator of neuropathy in type 2 diabetes

  • Meera F. Iyengar(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Luis F. Soto
    ,
  • David Requena
    ,
  • Andrea O. Ruiz-Alejos
    ,
  • Yvonne Huaylinos
    ,
  • Ricardo Velasquez
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Johns Hopkins University
    ,
  • The Rockefeller University
    ,
  • Vanderbilt University
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

108143

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (Volume 163)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2020

Publication status

Published - 05/2020

ISSN

0168-8227

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85083579012
  • PubMed: 32283127

Abstract

Aims: Explore potential of 31 tear biomarkers involved in screening for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Assess the utility of aesthesiometry for measuring corneal damage in DPN and determine optimal cutoff point for detecting DPN. Methods: Screening test pilot study recruited 90 participants from a tertiary hospital in Lima, Peru. Participants were grouped by diabetes and neuropathy status. Tears collected on Schirmer strips, and proteins measured by both ELISA and multiplex-bead assay. Corneal sensitivity was measured by aesthesiometry, and DPN by vibration perception threshold testing. Results: There were 89 participants included in the analysis. The mean age was 55.7 ± 1.46, and 58.4% were female. MMP-9 and TGF-alpha concentrations were higher in participants with DPN versus diabetes alone, though not significant. Aesthesiometry was decreased in individuals with DPN when compared to participants with diabetes alone (p < 0.01) and normal controls (p < 0.01). Optimal cutoff point for aesthesiometry was found to be 5.8 cm, with 79% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusions: Tears are an insufficient standalone tool for detecting DPN based on the biomarkers analyzed. Aesthesiometry is a simple, inexpensive, and accurate method to assess corneal damage associated with moderate-severe DPN, and its integration into screening practices has potential to improve detection of DPN in poor-resource settings.

Funding Details

This work was supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center Grant # D43TW009340 . The funder had no role in the design or conduct of this research. The authors acknowledge Dr. Miguel Pinto and Dr. Jorge Reyes Diaz for providing the space to conduct the study, and CRONICAS for providing clinical testing equipment. We acknowledge Dr. Manuela Verastegui Pimentel for providing laboratory space and equipment, and Edith Malaga, Jessy Condori A?azco, Sussana Oad, Grace Trompeter, and Hannah Steinburg for assisting with study procedures. MI, AORA, and RG conceived the study and did the overall directing and planning. MI, YH, and RV designed the computational framework and timeframe of study and recruited participants. MI, LFS, DR, and ABO analyzed the data. MI, LFS, DR, and RV wrote the manuscript with input from ABO and RG. This work was supported by the NIH Fogarty International Center Grant #D43TW009340. The funder had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
FundersFunding numbers
CRONICAS
-
Edith Malaga
-
Jessy Condori A?azco
-
FIC
D43TW009340

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
11
Captures
50

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well