Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Syphilis in the Americas: A protocol for a systematic review of syphilis prevalence and incidence in four high-risk groups, 1980-2016

  • Ken Kitayama(corresponding author)
    ,
  • ,
  • Jordan E. Lake
    ,
  • Amaya G. Perez-Brumer
    ,
  • Catherine E. Oldenburg
    ,
  • Bethany A. Myers
*Corresponding author for this work
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    ,
  • Mailman School of Public Health
    ,
  • University of California
    ,
  • University of California Los Angeles
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

195

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Systematic Reviews (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/10/2017

Publication status

Published - 10/10/2017

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85030837934
  • PubMed: 29017552

Abstract

Background: Syphilis infection has recently resurfaced as a significant public health problem. Although there has been a tremendous amount of research on the epidemiology of syphilis, there has been limited work done to synthesize the extensive body of research and systematically estimate patterns of disease within high-risk groups in the Americas. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to (1) summarize recent patterns of syphilis infection in North and South America among four high-risk groups (MSM, transgender women, sex workers, and incarcerated individuals) from 1980 to 2016, (2) identify and differentiate regional geographic epidemiologic characteristics, and (3) compare the epidemics of the economically developed countries of North America from the developing countries and public health systems of Latin America and the Caribbean. Methods/design: Primary studies reporting syphilis prevalence and/or incidence in at least one of the four high-risk groups will be identified from Medline/PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, SciELO, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL, Clase, and Periódica, as well as "gray" literature sources (conference abstracts, country reports, etc.). Studies published from 1980 through 2016 will be included. Data will be extracted from studies meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria and a random effects meta-analysis of prevalence and incidence estimates will be conducted. Heterogeneity, risk of bias, and publication bias will be assessed. Pooled prevalence and incidence estimates will be calculated for comparisons based on geographic region, risk factors, and time period. Discussion: Our systematic review and meta-analysis aims to contribute to an improved understanding of global epidemiologic patterns of syphilis infection in most-at-risk populations. Through systematic classification of the existing literature, and comparison of disease patterns across regional, temporal and socio-behavioral differences, we hope to improve public health surveillance and improve efforts to control the spread of disease across the Americas. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016047306.

Funding Details

During the elaboration of this project, KK was a research fellow in the NIH-funded South American Program in HIV Prevention Research (SAPHIR) of the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and gratefully acknowledges the support he received from the staff in both Lima and Los Angeles. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants R25 MHO87222 to JLC and K23AI110532 to JEL. The funders had no role in protocol design, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
FundersFunding numbers
NIH-funded
-
National Institutes of Health
R25 MHO87222, K23AI110532
NIMH
R25MH087222
University of California Los Angeles
-
Cumming School of Medicine
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
20
Captures
151

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well