Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Scoping review of measures of treatment burden in patients with multimorbidity: advancements and current gaps

  • Daniel Mendoza-Quispe(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Silvana Perez-Leon
    ,
  • ,
  • Andrea Gaspar
    ,
  • María Sofía Cuba-Fuentes
    ,
  • Joseph R. Zunt
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • University of Washington School of Medicine
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • University of Washington
    ,
  • Mayo Clinic
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 92-105 (14 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (Volume 159)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2023

Publication status

Published - 07/2023

ISSN

0895-4356

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85162181479
  • PubMed: 37217106

Abstract

Objectives: To identify, assess, and summarize the measures to assess burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity (BoT-MMs) and their measurement properties. Study Design and Setting: MEDLINE via PubMed was searched from inception until May 2021. Independent reviewers extracted data from studies in which BoT-MMs were developed, validated, or reported as used, including an assessment of their measurement properties (e.g., validity and reliability) using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. Results: Eight BoT-MMs were identified across 72 studies. Most studies were performed in English (68%), in high-income countries (90%), without noting urban-rural settings (90%). No BoT-MMs had both sufficient content validity and internal consistency; some measurement properties were either insufficient or uncertain (e.g., responsiveness). Other frequent limitations of BoT-MMs included absent recall time, presence of floor effects, and unclear rationale for categorizing and interpreting raw scores. Conclusion: The evidence needed for use of extant BoT-MMs in patients with multimorbidity remains insufficiently developed, including that of suitability for their development, measurement properties, interpretability of scores, and use in low-resource settings. This review summarizes this evidence and identifies issues needing attention for using BoT-MMs in research and clinical practice.

Funding Details

Funding: This research is funded by the Fogarty International Center (FIC) at the US National Institutes of Health (GRANT 1R21TW011740-01 ). The funders did not play any role in relation to this work.
FundersFunding numbers
NIH
1R21TW011740-01
FIC
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
13
Captures
31
Citations
17