Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Early Management of Stroke with Focus on Endovascular Treatment

  • Alba Navarro-Flores
    ,
  • Christoper A. Alarcon-Ruiz
    ,
  • Cristian Morán-Mariños
    ,
  • Alvaro Taype-Rondan
    ,
  • Joel M. Sequeiros
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal
    ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e249-e263

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

World Neurosurgery (Volume 155)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2021
  • Published - 11/2021

Publication status

Published - 11/2021

ISSN

1878-8750

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85114006156

Abstract

Background: Stroke represents one of the major causes of death and long-term disability worldwide and, even when new treatment strategies have been identified, there is a need of quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to guide and improve acute stroke care. We aim to describe the characteristics and assess the quality of CPGs in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke due to anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of CPGs that assessed stroke management. We searched the following databases: PubMed, TripDatabase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to identify CPGs published or updated in the last 3 years and used Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II to assess the quality of the guidelines. Results: We found a total of 9 CPGs published or updated between 2018 and 2020, from which only one third had adequate methodologic rigor. Guidelines presented pitfalls related to evidence search, assessment, and methods used to reach the recommendations. All the CPGs considered a 24-hour extended window of treatment and the CPGs considered the use of similar imaging techniques to diagnose and explore the extent of the stroke. However, there were variations regarding the selection criteria for thrombectomy. Conclusions: The quality of the CPGs varied widely, which issues around the identification and assessment of the evidence used to reach recommendations. Despite this, the recommendations regarding the use of thrombectomy were similar across the CPGs. Readers need to carefully assess the methodologic rigor of CPGs before applying them to their clinical practice.

Funding Details

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.