Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines

  • Yalil Augusto Rodríguez-Cárdenas
    ,
  • Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora
    ,
  • Aron Aliaga Del Castillo
    ,
  • Heraldo Luis Dias-Da Silveira
    ,
  • Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillén(corresponding author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • University of São Paulo
    ,
  • Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e0226267

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

PLoS ONE (Volume 14, Issue 12)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/12/2019

Publication status

Published - 01/12/2019

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85076090906
  • PubMed: 31821357

Abstract

Objective To compare the root and alveolar bone changes in first premolars adjacent to the orthodontic traction of buccal versus palatal maxillary impacted canines (MIC). Materials and methods Before and after traction, cone beam tomographic computed (CBCTs) of 25 subjects with unilateral/bilateral MIC were included in this follow-up and retrospective study. Thirty-six first premolars were divided into 2 groups, buccal (n = 15) or palatal (n = 21) MIC, and the tomographic images were evaluated before and after orthodontic traction. Root changes in length and area were measured in sagittal, coronal and axial sections. Dimensions of alveolar bone were evaluated in coronal sections. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using t or Mann-Whitney U tests. Multiple linear regressions analyses were used to evaluate the influence of all predictor variables on root and alveolar bone changes (P<0.05). Results Root and alveolar bone changes produced by orthodontic traction were not significant between groups. Root changes were smaller than 1 mm (length) and 2.51 mm2 (area). Alveolar bone changes between buccal and palatal MIC groups ranged from 0.13 mm to 1.69 mm Furthermore, the multivariate analysis showed no significant influence of the impaction condition (buccal or palatal) on root change. Nevertheless, some different predictor variables of the MIC influence these changes. In the alveolar bone, the maximum upper alveolar width (MUAW) is the most affected by the traction of the MIC. Conclusions Orthodontic traction of buccal vs palatal MIC produces similar resorptive and appositional root and alveolar bone changes in the adjacent first premolars, without clinical relevance.