Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Rescue Therapy for Failed Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry

  • ,
  • Fazeel M. Siddiqui
    ,
  • Milagros Galecio-Castillo
    ,
  • Mahmoud H. Mohammaden
    ,
  • Jaydevsinh N. Dolia
    ,
  • Jonathan A. Grossberg
  • ,
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    ,
  • Emory School of Medicine
    ,
  • University of Texas Rio Grande Valley School of Medicine
    ,
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    ,
  • Cooper Medical School of Rowan University
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 343-355 (13 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of Neurology (Volume 96, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/2024

Publication status

Published - 08/2024

ISSN

0364-5134

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85193403319
  • PubMed: 38752428

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the association between rescue therapy (RT) and functional outcomes compared to medical management (MM) in patients presenting after failed mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized prospectively collected and maintained data from the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Registry, spanning from 2011 to 2021. The cohort comprised patients with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) with failed MT. The primary outcome was the shift in the degree of disability, as gauged by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. Additional outcomes included functional independence (90-day mRS score of 0–2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results: Of a total of 7,018 patients, 958 presented failed MT and were included in the analysis. The RT group comprised 407 (42.4%) patients, and the MM group consisted of 551 (57.5%) patients. After adjusting for confounders, the RT group showed a favorable shift in the overall 90-day mRS distribution (adjusted common odds ratio = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.32–2.45, p < 0.001) and higher rates of functional independence (RT: 28.8% vs MM: 15.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.21–3.07, p = 0.005) compared to the MM group. RT also showed lower rates of sICH (RT: 3.8% vs MM: 9.1%, aOR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.28–0.97, p = 0.039) and 90-day mortality (RT: 33.4% vs MM: 45.5%, aOR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42–0.89, p = 0.009). Interpretation: Our findings advocate for the utilization of RT as a potential treatment strategy for cases of LVO resistant to first-line MT techniques. Prospective studies are warranted to validate these observations and optimize the endovascular approach for failed MT patients. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:343–355.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
1
Citations
13
Usage
89
Captures
8