Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Reliability of Visual Analog Scale and Numeric Rating Scale for the Assessment of Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

  • ,
  • Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages S170-S173

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases (Volume 26, Issue 7 S)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/10/2020

Publication status

Published - 01/10/2020

ISSN

1076-1608

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85091807329
  • PubMed: 31899713

Abstract

Objective: To determine the reliability of SLE patients' disease activity measurements. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted (August 2016- December 2017) at 2 main public Peruvian hospitals, 1 with a comprehensive lupus care program. Patients assessed their disease activity with a visual analog scale (VAS) (0-100 mm) or a numerical rating scale (NRS) (0-4) before and after their physician's (MD's) assessment. Demographic and disease-related characteristics were recorded. Reliability of patients' disease activity before and after MD's assessment was determined using Spearman rank correlation. Factors possibly associated with this variability were examined with Spearman rank correlation andMann-Whitney U test. Results: Two hundred forty, mostlyMestizo, SLE patients were included; mean (SD) age and disease duration (diagnosis) were 34.9 (12.9) years and 10.1 (7.0) years, respectively. The Mexican version of the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index was 1.9 (2.7), and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index was 1.2 (1.5). The correlations between NRS and VAS before and after the MD's assessment were ρ = 0.839; p < 0.001; and ρ = 0.872; p < 0.001, respectively. Visual analog scale and NRS were higher before than after the MD's assessment (VAS 29.3 [26.5] and 26.5 [24.9], p = 0.052; and NRS (1.5 [1.2] and 1.3 [1.1], p = 0.003); only the comprehensive program explained this variability (p = 0.043). The reliability of VAS and NRS was ρ = 0.917 and ρ = 0.861, p < 0.001, before and after for the comprehensive program and ρ = 0.710 and ρ = 0.785, p < 0.001, for before and after for the regular program. Conclusions: Both VAS an NRS are highly reliable. Patients scored higher before than after their physicians' assessment but that these differences were smaller for the patients in the comprehensive care program than in the regular one.

Funding Details

This work was partially supported by an institutional grant from EsSalud (1483-GCGP-ESSALUD-2013, 1733-GCGP-ESSALUD-2014) and the 2015 Kaelin Prize and one from the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) (2015 PANLAR Prize).
FundersFunding numbers
EsSalud
-