Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in cancer patients

  • Ana L. Vilela-Estrada
    ,
  • David Villarreal-Zegarra(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Anthony Copez-Lonzoy
    ,
  • Loida Esenarro-Valencia
    ,
  • José C. Sánchez-Ramírez
    ,
  • Fernando Lamas-Delgado
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Instituto Peruano de Orientación Psicológica
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Union
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

1497946

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Frontiers in Psychology (Volume 15)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2024

Publication status

Published - 2024

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85217660064

Abstract

Background: Although the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has been widely studied across various populations, there is still no consensus on its factor structure. This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the HADS in cancer patients. Methods: Our study was cross-sectional and non-probabilistic. It involved 467 cancer patients aged 18 years and over, who were treated at a public institution specialized in oncology. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory were used. We evaluated their internal structure, measurement invariance, relationship with other variables, and reliability. Results: It was found that the HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure where there is one general factor (emotional distress) and two specific factors (anxiety and depression). The HADS demonstrates invariance with respect to sex and years of education. It shows a moderate correlation with the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Beck Depression Inventory. In addition, it presents acceptable levels of reliability and relationship with instruments used in the diagnosis of anxiety and depression. Conclusion: The HADS is best suited to a bifactorial structure in cancer populations, with comparisons across both sexes and varying levels of education. Its brevity, versatility, hospital-focused design, and extensive validation make the HADS a very important instrument in the detection of anxiety and depression in cancer patients.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
11
Mentions
1
Captures
24

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well