Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Psychological Inflexibility and Psychological Distress in Adults: The Mediating Role of Resilience

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Ricardo Palma
    ,
  • Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Research
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

1632

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Behavioral Sciences (Volume 16, Issue 9)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 09/2026

Publication status

Published - 09/2026

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105051368216

Abstract

Introduction: The high prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults affects their overall functioning. Within Relational Frame Theory, psychological inflexibility is theoretically associated with avoidance of private events and has been linked to greater anxiety and depressive symptoms and lower resilience. However, the integration of these constructs into explanatory models remains limited, restricting the understanding of their interrelationships and potentially relevant protective resources. Objective: To examine the indirect association between psychological inflexibility and psychological distress through resilience within a theoretically specified cross-sectional model. Methods: A cross-sectional design with latent variables was employed using a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 950 Peruvian adults (64% women), recruited in Metropolitan Lima, who completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and psychological measures. Statistical analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling. Results: The proposed model demonstrated adequate fit (robust CFI = 0.94, robust RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI [0.050, 0.057], SRMR = 0.04). Psychological inflexibility showed a strong positive direct association with psychological distress (β = 0.803, p < 0.001) and a significant indirect association through resilience (β = 0.073, p < 0.001]). This pattern was consistent with complementary mediation within the specified cross-sectional model. Conclusions: Higher psychological inflexibility was associated with lower resilience and greater psychological distress. Resilience statistically accounted for a small but significant portion of the association between psychological inflexibility and distress, whereas the direct association remained predominant. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of temporal or causal relationships. Longitudinal research is required to examine the directionality of these associations.

Publication metrics

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well