Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Prevalence of computer vision syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Fabricio Ccami-Bernalb(Author)
    ,
  • David R. Soriano-Morenoe(Author)
    ,
  • Milton A. Romero-Roblesd(Author)
    ,
  • Fernanda Barriga-Chambib(Author)
    ,
  • Kimberly G. Tucoe(Author)
    ,
  • Sharong D. Castro-Diaze(Author)
  • ,
  • bFacultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de San Agustín
    ,
  • cUniversidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • dMinisterio de Salud (MINSA)
    ,
  • eUniversidad Peruana Union
    ,
  • fHospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
Research Output: Contribution to journal Review article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Review article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

100482

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Optometry (Volume 17, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published
    - 01/01/2024

Publication status

Published
- 01/01/2024

ISSN

1888-4296

External Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85174459677
  • PubMed: 37866176

Abstract

Purpose: This review aimed to estimate the prevalence of computer vision syndrome (CVS) in the general population and subgroups. Methods: A search was conducted in the following the databases: PubMed, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science until February 13, 2023. We included studies that assessed the prevalence of CVS in any population. The Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of CVS was done using a random-effects model, assessing the sources of heterogeneity using subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Results: A total of 103 cross-sectional studies with 66 577 participants were included. The prevalence of CVS was 69.0% (95% CI: 62.3 to 75.3; I2: 99.7%), ranging from 12.1 to 97.3% across studies. Point prevalence was higher in women than in men (71.4 vs. 61.8%), university students (76.1%), Africa (71.2%), Asia (69.9%), contact lens wearers (73.1% vs. 63.8%) in studies conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic (72.8%), and in those that did not use the CVS-Q questionnaire (75.4%). In meta-regression, using the CVS-Q scale was associated with a lower prevalence of CVS. Conclusion: Seven out of ten people suffer from CVS. Preventive strategies and interventions are needed to decrease the prevalence of this condition which can affect productivity and quality of life. Future studies should standardize a definition of CVS.