Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Polymerization shrinkage stress, internal adaptation, and dentin bond strength of bulk-fill restorative materials

  • Beatriz Curvello de Mendonça
    ,
  • Beatriz de Cássia Romano
    ,
  • Maicon Sebold
    ,
  • Bruna Marin Fronza
    ,
  • Roberto Ruggiero Braga
    ,
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Campinas
    ,
  • University of São Paulo
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • Dalhousie University
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

102964

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives (Volume 111)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2021

Publication status

Published - 12/2021

ISSN

0143-7496

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85111957371

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate polymerization shrinkage stress (PSS), internal gap formation (IGF), and dentin bond strength (DBS) of one conventional resin composite and five bulk-fill restorative materials. Materials and methods: One conventional resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra/SU) and five bulk-fill restorative materials: two regular paste-consistency composites (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill/TE and Opus Bulk Fill/OP), one low-viscosity dual-cure composite (Fill-Up!/FI), one bioactive material (Activa BioActive Restorative/AC), and one high-viscosity glass ionomer (Equia Forte Fil/EQ) were tested. PSS was determined with a tensiometer attached to a universal testing machine (n = 5). For IGF, Class I cavities prepared in the occlusal surface of extracted third molars (n = 5) were filled up, cross-sectioned, and analyzed in scanning electron microscopy. The DBS was evaluated with microtensile bond strength test measured after 24 h or one-year storage. Data were statistically analyzed by one and two-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: FI, SU, and OP presented higher PPS values and EQ showed the lowest ones. IGF was lower for OP and AC. SU showed the greatest DBS values and OP and FI the lowest after one-year storage. Conclusions: No correlation between PSS and IGF was found. Little difference in DBS among the restorative materials was detected, and its stability was material dependent.

Funding Details

This study was supported by the São Paulo State Research Foundation ( #2017/04548-2 ).
FundersFunding numbers
FAPESP
2017/04548-2