Plagiarism, Cheating and Research Integrity: Case Studies from a Masters Program in Peru
- Andres M. Carnero,
- ,
- Kelika A. Konda,
- Edward Mezones-Holguin,
- Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz,
- German F. Alvarado
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia,
- ,
- Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas,
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA,
- Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia,
- U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6
Open access
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 1183-1197 (15 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Science and Engineering Ethics (Volume 23, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 01/08/2017
Publication status
ISSN
1353-3452Publication IDs
- Scopus: 84995426737
- PubMed: 27848191
Abstract
Plagiarism is a serious, yet widespread type of research misconduct, and is often neglected in developing countries. Despite its far-reaching implications, plagiarism is poorly acknowledged and discussed in the academic setting, and insufficient evidence exists in Latin America and developing countries to inform the development of preventive strategies. In this context, we present a longitudinal case study of seven instances of plagiarism and cheating arising in four consecutive classes (2011–2014) of an Epidemiology Masters program in Lima, Peru, and describes the implementation and outcomes of a multifaceted, “zero-tolerance” policy aimed at introducing research integrity. Two cases involved cheating in graded assignments, and five cases correspond to plagiarism in the thesis protocol. Cases revealed poor awareness of high tolerance to plagiarism, poor academic performance, and widespread writing deficiencies, compensated with patchwriting and copy-pasting. Depending on the events’ severity, penalties included course failure (6/7) and separation from the program (3/7). Students at fault did not engage in further plagiarism. Between 2011 and 2013, the Masters program sequentially introduced a preventive policy consisting of: (i) intensified research integrity and scientific writing education, (ii) a stepwise, cumulative writing process; (iii) honor codes; (iv) active search for plagiarism in all academic products; and (v) a “zero-tolerance” policy in response to documented cases. No cases were detected in 2014. In conclusion, plagiarism seems to be widespread in resource-limited settings and a greater response with educational and zero-tolerance components is needed to prevent it.
Funding Details
Access to documents
Publication metrics
Metrics
PlumX, opens in new tab
Sustainable Development Goals
- SDG 3 Good Health and Well
