Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • ,
  • Juan Vivanco-Suarez
    ,
  • Nicole M. Castillo-Huerta
    ,
  • David Espinoza-Martinez
    ,
  • Cristian Morán-Mariños
    ,
  • Ximena Espiritu-Vilcapoma
  • ,
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad de San Martin de Porres
    ,
  • Universidad César Vallejo
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Interventional Neuroradiology

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2024

Publication status

Accepted/In press - 2024

ISSN

1591-0199

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85206938075
  • PubMed: 39360396

Abstract

Background: The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter. Methods: A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted. Results: Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%–78%; I2= 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%–96%; I2= 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%–12%; I2= 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%–11%; I2= 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%–7%; I2= 0%). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.