Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Molecular and serological prevalence of coronavirus in chiropterans: A systematic review with meta-analysis

  • D. Katterine Bonilla-Aldana
    ,
  • Doménica Acevedo-López
    ,
  • Brayan Stiven Aristizábal-Carmona
    ,
  • Fabio Andrés Díaz-García
    ,
  • Cristian Camilo Sarmiento-Cano
    ,
  • Samuel Gutiérrez-Soleibe
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Asociación Colombiana de Infectología (ACIN)
    ,
  • Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma de las Américas
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Privada Franz Tamayo (UNIFRANZ)
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud
    ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 181-190 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Infezioni in Medicina (Volume 29, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2021

Publication status

Published - 2021

ISSN

1124-9390

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85107422968
  • PubMed: 34061782

Abstract

In recent years, and now especially with the arrival of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), there has been increased interest in under-standing the role of bats in the dynamics of transmission and origin of this pandemic agent. To date, no systematic reviews have been published on this topic. This systematic review aimed to summarize and highlight the frequen-cy of bat infections reported in currently available obser-vational studies for coronavirus. The purpose of this study was also to examine the differences between the pool prevalence by technique and country. We performed a systematic literature review with meta-analysis, using three databases to assess coronavirus (CoV) infection in bats and its diagnosis by serological and molecular tests. We carried out random-effects model meta-analysis to cal-culate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). In all, 824 articles were retrieved (1960-2021). After screening by abstract/title, 43 articles were selected for full-text assessment. Of these, 33 were finally included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. From the total of studies, the pool prevalence by RT-PCR (n=14,295 bats) for CoV was 9.8% (95% CI 8.7-10.9%); Italy reported the highest pooled prevalence (44.9%, 95% CI 31.6-58.1%), fol-lowed by the Philippines (29.6%). Regarding the ELISA, the pool prevalence for coronavirus from 15 studies, in-cluding 359 bats, was 30.2% (95% CI 14.7-45.6%). The re-sults for coronaviruses with the MIF were significantly lower, 2.6% (95% CI 1.5-3.7%). A considerable proportion of infected bats tested positive, particularly by molecular tests. This essential condition highlights the relevance of bats and the need for future studies to detail their role as potential reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2. In this meta-analysis, bats were positive in almost 10% by RT-PCR, suggesting their relevance and the need to understand their potential participation in maintaining wild zoonotic transmission.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well