Mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of primary and secondary distal medium-vessel occlusion stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis
- ,
- Juan Vivanco-Suarez,
- Joel M. Sequeiros,
- Milagros Galecio-Castillo,
- Cynthia B. Zevallos,
- Mudassir Farooqui
- ,
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics,
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
EnglishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages e460-e467Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (Volume 15, Issue e3)Publication milestones
- Accepted/In press - 2023
- Published - 12/2023
Publication status
ISSN
1759-8478Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85159630895
- PubMed: 36797050
Abstract
background There is limited evidence on the indication and role of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with distal medium-vessel occlusions (DMVOs). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate all the evidence available on the efficacy and safety of MT techniques (stent retriever, aspiration) in primary and secondary DMVOs. Methods Five databases were searched from inception to January 2023 for studies of MT in primary and secondary DMVOs. Outcomes of interest included favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–2), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Prespecified subgroup meta-analyses according to the specific MT technique and to the vascular territory (distal M2-M5, A2-A5, P2-P5) were also performed. results A total of 29 studies with 1262 patients were included. For primary DMVOs (n=971 patients), pooled rates of successful reperfusion, favorable outcome, 90-day mortality and sICH were 84% (95% confidence interval (CI) 76 to 90%), 64% (95% CI 54 to 72%), 12% (95% CI 8 to 18%), and 6% (95% CI 4 to 10%), respectively. For secondary DMVOs (n=291 patients), pooled rates of successful reperfusion, favorable outcome, 90-day mortality and sICH were 82% (95% CI 73 to 88%), 54% (95% CI 39 to 69%), 11% (95% CI 5 to 20%), and 3% (95% CI 1 to 9%), respectively. Subgroup analyses by MT technique and by vascular territory showed no differences in primary and secondary DMVOs. Conclusion Our findings suggest that MT using aspiration or stent retriever techniques appears to be effective and safe in primary and secondary DMVOs. However, given the level of evidence of our results, further confirmation in well-designed randomized controlled trials is needed.
