Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Long COVID clinical evaluation, research and impact on society: a global expert consensus

  • The Long COVID consensus expert panel
    ,
  • Andrew G. Ewing(corresponding author)(Author)
    ,
  • David Joffe(Author)
    ,
  • Svetlana Blitshteyn(Author)
    ,
  • Anna E.S. Brooks(Author)
    ,
  • Julien Wist(Author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Gothenburg
    ,
  • World Health Network Long Covid Expert Advisory Group
    ,
  • Royal North Shore Hospital
    ,
  • Woolcock Institute of Medical Research
    ,
  • State University of New York at Buffalo
    ,
  • Dysautonomia Clinic
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

27

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials (Volume 24, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/12/2025

Publication status

Published - 01/12/2025

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 105003794799
  • PubMed: 40254579

Abstract

Background: Long COVID is a complex, heterogeneous syndrome affecting over four hundred million people globally. There are few recommendations, and no formal training exists for medical professionals to assist with clinical evaluation and management of patients with Long COVID. More research into the pathology, cellular, and molecular mechanisms of Long COVID, and treatments is needed. The goal of this work is to disseminate essential information about Long COVID and recommendations about definition, diagnosis, treatment, research and social issues to physicians, researchers, and policy makers to address this escalating global health crisis. Methods: A 3-round modified Delphi consensus methodology was distributed internationally to 179 healthcare professionals, researchers, and persons with lived experience of Long COVID in 28 countries. Statements were combined into specific areas: definition, diagnosis, treatment, research, and society. Results: The survey resulted in 187 comprehensive statements reaching consensus with the strongest areas being diagnosis and clinical assessment, and general research. We establish conditions for diagnosis of different subgroups within the Long COVID umbrella. Clear consensus was reached that the impacts of COVID-19 infection on children should be a research priority, and additionally on the need to determine the effects of Long COVID on societies and economies. The consensus on COVID and Long COVID is that it affects the nervous system and other organs and is not likely to be observed with initial symptoms. We note, biomarkers are critically needed to address these issues. Conclusions: This work forms initial guidance to address the spectrum of Long COVID as a disease and reinforces the need for translational research and large-scale treatment trials for treatment protocols.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well