Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Critical reading of medical evidence: How to read observational studies?

Original title: Lectura crítica de evidencia médica en el contexto de COVID-19:¿Cómo leer estudios observacionales?
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Señor de Sipán
    ,
  • Tau-Relaped Group
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
    ,
  • Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 410-417 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Revista del Cuerpo Medico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo (Volume 13, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2020

Publication status

Published - 2020

ISSN

2225-5109

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85150171818

Abstract

Objetive. The critical reading of scientific articles allows the medical community, above all, to improve the context of decision making. The great amount of scientific production worldwide makes use of observational studies, however, a significant proportion is not useful for decision making, not because of its methodological limitations but because of errors in its application. Many studies published in relation to coronavirus 2019 disease have limitations and require statistical, epidemiological and clinical tools to be able to assess them and incorporate them into the practice of evidence-based medicine. In this review, we analyze the different observational research designs and with the help of examples we will see the different steps in the research process.