Critical reading of medical evidence: How to read observational studies?
- Joshuan J. Barboza,
- ,
- Diego F. Pinto-Ruiz,
- José Caballero-Alvarado
- Universidad Señor de Sipán,
- Tau-Relaped Group,
- ,
- Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos,
- Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego
Publication Information
Output type
Original language
SpanishPages from-to (Number of pages)
Pages 410-417 (8 pages)Journal (Volume, Issue Number)
Revista del Cuerpo Medico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo (Volume 13, Issue 4)Publication milestones
- Published - 2020
Publication status
ISSN
2225-5109Publication IDs
- Scopus: 85150171818
Abstract
Objetive. The critical reading of scientific articles allows the medical community, above all, to improve the context of decision making. The great amount of scientific production worldwide makes use of observational studies, however, a significant proportion is not useful for decision making, not because of its methodological limitations but because of errors in its application. Many studies published in relation to coronavirus 2019 disease have limitations and require statistical, epidemiological and clinical tools to be able to assess them and incorporate them into the practice of evidence-based medicine. In this review, we analyze the different observational research designs and with the help of examples we will see the different steps in the research process.
