Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Job Preferences of Nurses and Midwives for Taking Up a Rural Job in Peru: A Discrete Choice Experiment

  • Luis Huicho(corresponding author)
    ,
  • J. Jaime Miranda
    ,
  • ,
  • Claudia Lema
    ,
  • Andrés G. Lescano
    ,
  • Mylene Lagarde
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
    ,
  • ,
  • Salud Sin Límites Perú
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e50315

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

PLoS ONE (Volume 7, Issue 12)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 20/12/2012

Publication status

Published - 20/12/2012

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84871402934
  • PubMed: 23284636

Abstract

Background: Robust evidence on interventions to improve the shortage of health workers in rural areas is needed. We assessed stated factors that would attract short-term contract nurses and midwives to work in a rural area of Peru. Methods and Findings: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to evaluate the job preferences of nurses and midwives currently working on a short-term contract in the public sector in Ayacucho, Peru. Job attributes, and their levels, were based on literature review, qualitative interviews and focus groups of local health personnel and policy makers. A labelled design with two choices, rural community or Ayacucho city, was used. Job attributes were tailored to these settings. Multiple conditional logistic regressions were used to assess the determinants of job preferences. Then we used the best-fitting estimated model to predict the impact of potential policy incentives on the probability of choosing a rural job or a job in Ayacucho city. We studied 205 nurses and midwives. The odds of choosing an urban post was 14.74 times than that of choosing a rural one. Salary increase, health center-type of facility and scholarship for specialization were preferred attributes for choosing a rural job. Increased number of years before securing a permanent contract acted as a disincentive for both rural and urban jobs. Policy simulations showed that the most effective attraction package to uptake a rural job included a 75% increase in salary plus scholarship for a specialization, which would increase the proportion of health workers taking a rural job from 36.4% up to 60%. Conclusions: Urban jobs were more strongly preferred than rural ones. However, combined financial and non-financial incentives could almost double rural job uptake by nurses and midwifes. These packages may provide meaningful attraction strategies to rural areas and should be considered by policy makers for implementation.