Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Impact of COVID-19 Mandatory Lockdown Measures on Cognitive and Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Persons with Alzheimer's Disease in Lima, Peru

  • Nilton Custodio(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Marco Malaga
    ,
  • Rosa Montesinos
    ,
  • ,
  • Fiorella Baca
    ,
  • Sheila Castro
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Privada San Juan Bautista
    ,
  • Instituto Peruano de Neurociencias
    ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas
    ,
  • docencia y atención especializada en epilepsia
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 80-88 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Current Alzheimer Research (Volume 20, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2023

Publication status

Published - 2023

ISSN

1567-2050

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85164256324
  • PubMed: 37073648

Abstract

Background: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) worsened during the COVID-19 lockdowns, but their progression thereafter is unknown. We present the first longitudinal study tracking them before, during, and after restrictions. Objectives: To describe the effect of the COVID-19 mandatory lockdowns on Cognitive and Neuro-psychiatric symptoms in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Methods: Cohort of 48 patients with amnestic MCI and 38 with AD in Lima, Peru. They received three rounds of cognitive (RUDAS, CDR, M@T), behavioral (NPI), and functional (ADCS-ADL) as-sessments. We assessed the change in score means across the time points and for each domain of NPS and tracked the changes in individual patients. Results: RUDAS declined 0.9 (SD 1.0) from baseline to lockdown and 0.7 (SD 1.0) after restrictions. M@T declined 1.0 (SD 1.5) from baseline to lockdown and 1.4 (SD 2.0) after restrictions. CDR worsened in 72 patients (83.72%) from baseline to post-lockdown. NPI worsened by 10 (SD 8.3) from baseline to lockdown but improved by 4.8 (SD 6.4) after restrictions. Proportionally, 81.3% of all patients had worsened NPS during the lockdowns, but only 10.7% saw an increase thereafter. Improvement was statistically significant for specific NPS domains except hallucinations, delusions, and appe-tite changes. Anxiety, irritability, apathy, and disinhibition returned to baseline levels. Conclusion: Following confinement, cognition continued to decline, but NPS demonstrated either stability or improvement. This highlights the role modifiable risk factors may have on the progression of NPS.