Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Illuminating gillnets to save seabirds and the potential for multi-taxa bycatch mitigation

  • Jeffrey C. Mangel(corresponding author)
    ,
  • John Wang
    ,
  • ,
  • Sergio Pingo
    ,
  • Astrid Jimenez
    ,
  • Felipe Carvalho
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Exeter
    ,
  • Pro Delphinus
    ,
  • NOAA Fisheries Service
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Royal Society Open Science (Volume 5, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/07/2018

Publication status

Published - 11/07/2018

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85050009801

Abstract

Bycatch in net fisheries is recognized as a major source of mortality for many marine species, including seabirds. Few mitigation solutions, however, have been identified. We assessed the effectiveness of illuminating fishing nets with green light emitting diodes (LEDs) to reduce the incidental capture of seabirds. Experiments were conducted in the demersal, set gillnet fishery of Constante, Peru and compared 114 pairs of control and illuminated nets. We observed captures of a total of 45 guanay cormorants (Phalacrocorax bougainvillii), with 39 caught in control nets and six caught in illuminated nets. Seabird bycatch in terms of catch-per-unit-effort was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in control nets than in illuminated nets, representing an 85.1% decline in the cormorant bycatch rate. This study, showing that net illumination reduces seabird bycatch and previous studies showing reductions in sea turtle bycatch without reducing target catch, indicates that net illumination can be an effective multi-taxa bycatch mitigation technique. This finding has broad implications for bycatch mitigation in net fisheries given LED technology’s relatively low cost, the global ubiquity of net fisheries and the current paucity of bycatch mitigation solutions.

Funding Details

Ethics. All necessary permits and permissions were obtained to carry out this research. Data accessibility. The dataset supporting this article has been uploaded as electronic supplementary material. Authors’ contributions. J.C.M., J.W., B.J.G. and J.A.S. designed the study. S.P. and A.J. performed the study. J.C.M., J.W. and F.C. performed the statistical analysis. All authors interpreted data and contributed to writing the manuscript and gave final approval for publication. Competing interests. We declare we have no competing interests. Funding. This work was supported by the DEFRA Darwin Initiative, the NOAA Fisheries Service and the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation. Acknowledgements. We thank the entire ProDelphinus team that participated in data collection. We also thank the fishermen and their families at Constante, Piura, Peru, for their support on every fishing trip.
FundersFunding numbers
NOAA Fisheries Service
-
NFWF
-
Defra
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Mentions
11
Citations
50
Captures
132

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water