Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Handheld computers for self-administered sensitive data collection: A comparative study in Peru

  • Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Walter H. Curioso
    ,
  • Marco A. Gonzales
    ,
  • Wilfredo Evangelista
    ,
  • Jesus M. Castagnetto
    ,
  • Cesar P. Carcamo
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • University of Washington School of Medicine
    ,
  • Imperial College London
    ,
  • University of Washington
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

11

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (Volume 8)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2008

Publication status

Published - 2008

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 42449109960
  • PubMed: 18366687

Abstract

Background. Low-cost handheld computers (PDA) potentially represent an efficient tool for collecting sensitive data in surveys. The goal of this study is to evaluate the quality of sexual behavior data collected with handheld computers in comparison with paper-based questionnaires. Methods. A PDA-based program for data collection was developed using Open-Source tools. In two cross-sectional studies, we compared data concerning sexual behavior collected with paper forms to data collected with PDA-based forms in Ancon (Lima). Results. The first study enrolled 200 participants (18-29 years). General agreement between data collected with paper format and handheld computers was 86%. Categorical variables agreement was between 70.5% and 98.5% (Kappa: 0.43-0.86) while numeric variables agreement was between 57.1% and 79.8% (Spearman: 0.76-0.95). Agreement and correlation were higher in those who had completed at least high school than those with less education. The second study enrolled 198 participants. Rates of responses to sensitive questions were similar between both kinds of questionnaires. However, the number of inconsistencies (p = 0.0001) and missing values (p = 0.001) were significantly higher in paper questionnaires. Conclusion. This study showed the value of the use of handheld computers for collecting sensitive data, since a high level of agreement between paper and PDA responses was reached. In addition, a lower number of inconsistencies and missing values were found with the PDA-based system. This study has demonstrated that it is feasible to develop a low-cost application for handheld computers, and that PDAs are feasible alternatives for collecting field data in a developing country.

Funding Details

Supported by the Joint International Infectious Disease Initiative of the Wellcome Trust and the Burroughs-Wellcome Foundation (059131/Z/99/ A), by the University of Washington Center for AIDS Research Grant AI 27757, and STI-TM Cooperation Research Center AI by the NIH Fogarty International Center AIDS International Training and Research Program Grant D43-TW00007, by the Comprehensive International Program of Research on AIDS Grant 5U19AI053218, and by the Global Health Peru Program at UPCH, a Fogarty International Center/NIH funded grant (5R25TW007490).
FundersFunding numbers
Burroughs-Wellcome Foundation
059131/Z/99/ A
Comprehensive International Program of Research on AIDS
5U19AI053218
STI-TM Cooperation Research Center AI
-
NIH
-
FIC
R25TW007490, D43-TW00007
CFAR
AI 27757
WT
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
102
Captures
120

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well