Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical practice guideline for the initial pharmacological treatment of lupus nephritis in the Peruvian Social Security (EsSalud)

Original title: Guía de práctica clínica para el tratamiento farmacológico inicial de nefritis lúpica en el Seguro Social del Perú (EsSalud)
  • ,
  • Sergio Goicochea-Lugo
    ,
  • Milton A. Romero-Robles
    ,
  • Zhamanda N. Ortiz-Benique
    ,
  • Milko Ugaz-Zegarra
    ,
  • Juan E. Rodríguez-Mori
  • Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud
    ,
  • Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional del Santa
    ,
  • Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad Nacional de San Agustín
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo, EsSalud
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren, EsSalud
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 523-534 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Revista del Cuerpo Medico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo (Volume 14, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2021

Publication status

Published - 10/2021

ISSN

2225-5109

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85132611861

Abstract

Background: This article summarizes the clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the initial pharmacological treatment of lupus nephritis in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud). Objective: To provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for initial pharmacological treatment of non-refractory adults with class I to V lupus nephritis in EsSalud. Material and Methods: A guideline development group (GDG) was formed, which included specialist physicians and methodologists, who formulated clinical questions. Systematic searches were conducted for systematic reviews and - when deemed relevant - primary studies in PubMed during 2021. Evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic working meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. The CPG was reviewed by external experts before its approval. Results: The CPG addressed 6 clinical questions, divided into 2 topics: initial treatment of the induction and maintenance phase. Based on these questions, 11 recommendations were formulated (all conditional), 22 points of good clinical practice, and 2 flow charts. Conclusion: Evidence-based recommendations were issued for the management of patients with this pathology.