Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical practice guideline for the screening and management of the mild depressive episode at the first level of care for the Peruvian Social Security (EsSalud)

Original title: Guía de práctica clínica para el tamizaje y manejo del episodio depresivo leve en el primer nivel de atención del Seguro Social del Perú (EsSalud)
  • Beatrice Macciotta-Felices
    ,
  • Carla Morón-Corales
    ,
  • Matilde Luna-Matos
    ,
  • Víctor Gonzales-Madrid
    ,
  • Amelia Melgarejo-Moreno
    ,
  • Jessica H. Zafra-Tanaka
  • Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación, EsSalud
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud
    ,
  • Subgerencia de Atención Preventivo Promocional y Complejidad Creciente
    ,
  • Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren, EsSalud
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional de Piura
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 536-547 (12 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Acta Medica Peruana (Volume 37, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2020

Publication status

Published - 10/2020

ISSN

1018-8800

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85153622187

Abstract

This paper summarizes the clinical practice guide (CPG) for the screening and management of mild depressive episode at the first level of care in the Social Security of Peru (EsSalud). A guideline development group (GDG) was established for develop this CPG, which included clinical and methodology specialists, who formulated 06 clinical questions. Systematic searches were conducted in Pubmed and GPC repositories to answer each question, and relevant evidence was selected. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. In periodic work meetings, the GDG used the GRADE methodology for reviewing the evidence and for developing recommendations. At the end, this CPG formulated 07 recommendations (03 strong and 04 conditional), 28 points of good clinical practice, and 02 flow charts were formulated.