Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Peruvian Neurology Society. Short Version

Original title: Guía de práctica clínica para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la distrofia muscular de Duchenne. Sociedad Peruana de Neurología. Versión Corta
  • Peggy Carol Martínez-Esteban(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Daniel Guillén-Pinto
    ,
  • Alfredo Alfonso Duran Padrós
    ,
  • Daniel Koc-Gonzales
    ,
  • Julio Flores-Bravo
    ,
  • Carlos Méndez-Dávalos
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Capítulo de Enfermedades Neuromusculares
    ,
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia
    ,
  • Clínica Ricardo Palma
    ,
  • Sociedad Peruana de Pediatría
    ,
  • Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, EsSalud
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 205-215 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Acta Medica Peruana (Volume 39, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/04/2022

Publication status

Published - 01/04/2022

ISSN

1018-8800

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85182301472

Abstract

Objective: to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Methods: a guideline development group (GEG) was formed that included specialized physicians in the fields of neurology, neuropediatrics, genetics, and methodology. The GEG asked eight clinical questions to be answered by recommendations in this clinical practice guidelines (CPG). We conducted a systematic search and - when deemed relevant - primary studies in Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials during 2021 were reviewed. Evidence was selected to answer each of the clinical questions posed. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. In periodic work meetings, the GEG used the GRADE methodology to review the evidence and formulate recommendations, points of good clinical practice, and a diagnosis and treatment flowchart. Results: this CPG addressed eight clinical questions, divided into three topics: screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Based on these questions, fifteen recommendations were formulated (10 strong, 5 conditional) and 11 points for good clinical practice. Conclusion: this paper summarizes the methodology and evidence-based conclusions of the CPG for the diagnosis and treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.