Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Flame curtain kilns produce biochar from dry biomass with minimal methane emissions

  • Gerard Cornelissen
    ,
  • Erlend Sørmo
    ,
  • Ruy Korscha Anaya de la Rosa
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

166547

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Science of the Total Environment (Volume 903)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/12/2023

Publication status

Published - 10/12/2023

ISSN

0048-9697

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85169574317
  • PubMed: 37640066

Abstract

Flame curtain kilns have emerged as the preferred biochar technology for smallholders but reported methane emissions (30 g kg−1 biochar) have impeded carbon certification. Here, for flame curtain kilns we show almost no methane (0–3.6 g kg−1 biochar) emissions for dry (<15 % moisture) feedstock consisting of twigs and leaves. Wet feedstock (>40 % moisture) however generated significant methane (>500 g kg−1 biochar), underscoring that feedstock preparation is decisive for the carbon balance. Even for dry feedstock, both aerosol and CO emissions were significant (21–82 and 40–118 g kg−1 biochar, respectively). The data demonstrate that certification of low-tech biochar made from dry twigs and leaves should not be objected to on the grounds of methane. Careful selection of feedstock and potential after-combustion of the syn-gases are probably needed to avoid CO and aerosol emissions. More data are needed on methane emissions of other dry feedstocks.

Funding Details

The authors would like to thank the Norwegian Research Council for the support of the study (grant agreement 299070 , VOW “Valorization of Organic Waste” project), and ProInnovate Peru (grant agreement EDI-5-P-044-21 ). The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Gerard Cornelissen reports financial support was provided by Norwegian Geotechnical Institute. Gerard Cornelissen reports a relationship with Norwegian Geotechnical Institute that includes: employment.The authors would like to thank the Norwegian Research Council for the support of the study (grant agreement 299070, VOW “Valorization of Organic Waste” project), and ProInnovate Peru (grant agreement EDI-5-P-044-21).
FundersFunding numbers
Norwegian Geotechnical Institute
-
ProInnovate Peru
EDI-5-P-044-21
Norges Forskningsråd
299070