Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Expanding the genetics and phenotypes of ocular congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders

  • Ocular CCDD Phenotyping Consortium
    ,
  • Julie A. Jurgens(Author)
    ,
  • Brenda J. Barry(Author)
    ,
  • Wai Man Chan(Author)
    ,
  • Sarah MacKinnon(Author)
    ,
  • Mary C. Whitman(Author)
  • Broad Institute
    ,
  • Harvard Medical School
    ,
  • Boston Children's Hospital
    ,
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    ,
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    ,
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

101216

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Genetics in Medicine (Volume 27, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2025

Publication status

Published - 04/2025

ISSN

1098-3600

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85205709953
  • PubMed: 39033378

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify genetic etiologies and genotype/phenotype associations for unsolved ocular congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders (oCCDDs). Methods: We coupled phenotyping with exome or genome sequencing of 467 probands (550 affected and 1108 total individuals) with genetically unsolved oCCDDs, integrating analyses of pedigrees, human and animal model phenotypes, and de novo variants to identify rare candidate single-nucleotide variants, insertion/deletions, and structural variants disrupting protein-coding regions. Prioritized variants were classified for pathogenicity and evaluated for genotype/phenotype correlations. Results: Analyses elucidated phenotypic subgroups, identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant(s) in 43 of 467 probands (9.2%), and prioritized variants of uncertain significance in 70 of 467 additional probands (15.0%). These included known and novel variants in established oCCDD genes, genes associated with syndromes that sometimes include oCCDDs (eg, MYH10 [HGNC:7568], KIF21B [HGNC:29442], TGFBR2 [HGNC:11773], and TUBB6 [HGNC:20776]), genes that fit the syndromic component of the phenotype but had no prior oCCDD association (eg, CDK13 [HGNC:1733], TGFB2 [HGNC:11768]), genes with no reported association with oCCDDs or the syndromic phenotypes (eg, TUBA4A [HGNC:12407], KIF5C [HGNC:6325], CTNNA1 [HGNC:2509], KLB [HGNC:15527], FGF21 [HGNC:3678]), and genes associated with oCCDD phenocopies that had resulted in misdiagnoses. Conclusion: This study suggests that unsolved oCCDDs are clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorders often overlapping other Mendelian conditions and nominates many candidates for future replication and functional studies.