Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Evaluating the factor structure and measurement invariance of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale across multiple countries, languages, and gender identities

  • Sungkyunkwan University Research Team
    ,
  • Loïs Fournier(corresponding author)(Author)
    ,
  • Beáta Bőthe(Author)
    ,
  • Zsolt Demetrovics(Author)
    ,
  • Mónika Koós(Author)
    ,
  • Shane W. Kraus(Author)
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Sungkyunkwan University
    ,
  • Department of Psychology
    ,
  • UNIL - University of Lausanne
    ,
  • Montreal University
    ,
  • Elte Eötvös Loránd University
    ,
  • University of Gibraltar
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 635-653 (19 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Assessment (Volume 32, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2024
  • Published - 07/2025

Publication status

Published - 07/2025

ISSN

1073-1911

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85200056224

Abstract

The UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Model and the various psychometric instruments developed and validated based on this model are well established in clinical and research settings. However, evidence regarding the psychometric validity, reliability, and equivalence across multiple countries of residence, languages, or gender identities, including gender-diverse individuals, is lacking to date. Using data from the International Sex Survey (N = 82,243), confirmatory factor analyses and measurement invariance analyses were performed on the preestablished five-factor structure of the 20-item short version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale to examine whether (a) psychometric validity and reliability and (b) psychometric equivalence hold across 34 country-of-residence-related, 22 language-related, and three gender-identity-related groups. The results of the present study extend the latter psychometric instrument’s well-established relevance to 26 countries, 13 languages, and three gender identities. Most notably, psychometric validity and reliability were evidenced across nine novel translations included in the present study (i.e., Croatian, English, German, Hebrew, Korean, Macedonian, Polish, Portuguese—Portugal, and Spanish—Latin American) and psychometric equivalence was evidenced across all three gender identities included in the present study (i.e., women, men, and gender-diverse individuals).

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
1
Mentions
2
Captures
39