Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Efficacy of omega-3 supplementation on sertraline continuous therapy to reduce depression or anxiety symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • ,
  • Red Latinoamericana de Cardiología
    ,
  • Torres de Salud National Research Center
    ,
  • Asociación para el Desarrollo de la Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud (ADIECS-UNMSM)
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
    ,
  • Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Review article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

113652

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Psychiatry Research (Volume 296)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 02/2021

Publication status

Published - 02/2021

ISSN

0165-1781

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85098469879
  • PubMed: 33348198

Abstract

We aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that determined the efficacy of adding omega-3 supplementation to the continuous sertraline therapy in adults with depression. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects. We used the Revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials version 2.0. to assess the risk of bias. Four RCTs were included. The follow-up ranged from eight to 12 weeks. Regarding the Beck Depression Inventory, the pooled SMD was 0.50 (95% CI: -0.51, 1.50; I2: 94.1%). A subgroup analysis was performed regarding the presence of coronary disease: SMD -0.17 (95% CI: -0.41, 0.07; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the pooled MD was 0.03 (95% CI: -2.22, 2.28; I2: 0.0%). Regarding the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the pooled MD was 0.42 (95% CI: -1.44, 2.29; I2: 35.7%). All pooled outcomes presented a very low certainty of the evidence. Three RCTs presented a low risk of bias in all domains; however, one study presented some concerns in two domains. No essential reductions in the outcomes were found. A subgroup analysis suggested that may be better not to provide the supplementation in patients with coronary disease. The evidence is not enough to make recommendations.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well