Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Efficacy and Safety of Colchicine in Post–acute Myocardial Infarction Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Carlos Diaz-Arocutipa
    ,
  • Jerry K. Benites-Meza
    ,
  • ,
  • Joshuan J. Barboza
    ,
  • Vinay Pasupuleti
    ,
  • Héctor Bueno
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • Subgerencia de Atención Preventivo Promocional y Complejidad Creciente
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional de Trujillo
    ,
  • Tau-Relaped Group
    ,
  • ,
  • Inc
Research Output: Contribution to journal Review article Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output: Contribution to journal Review article Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

676771

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (Volume 8)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2021

Publication status

Published - 2021

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85117402489

Abstract

Background: Inflammation plays a key role in atherosclerotic plaque destabilization and adverse cardiac remodeling. Recent evidence has shown a promising role of colchicine in patients with coronary artery disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine in post–acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Methods: We searched five electronic databases from inception to January 18, 2021, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating colchicine in post–acute MI patients. Primary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality and recurrent MI. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, levels of follow-up high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and drug-related adverse events. All meta-analyses used inverse-variance random-effects models. Results: Six RCTs involving 6,005 patients were included. Colchicine did not significantly reduce cardiovascular mortality [risk ratio (RR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.52–1.61; p = 0.64], recurrent MI (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.62–1.22; p = 0.28), all-cause mortality (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.61–1.85; p = 0.78), stroke (RR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.07–1.09; p = 0.05), urgent coronary revascularization (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.02–8.89; p = 0.19), or decreased levels of follow-up hs-CRP (mean difference, −1.95 mg/L; 95% CI, −12.88 to 8.98; p = 0.61) compared to the control group. There was no increase in any adverse events (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89–1.07; p = 0.34) or gastrointestinal adverse events (RR, 2.49; 95% CI, 0.48–12.99; p = 0.20). Subgroup analyses by colchicine dose (0.5 vs. 1 mg/day), time of follow-up (<1 vs. ≥1 year), and treatment duration (≤30 vs. >30 days) showed no changes in the overall findings. Conclusion: In post–acute MI patients, colchicine does not reduce cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, recurrent MI, or other cardiovascular outcomes. Also, colchicine did not increase drug-related adverse events.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citations
11
Social media
12
Captures
22