Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of phytase and chelated minerals on performance and indicators of bone mineralization in broilers

*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 6-14 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Archivos de Zootecnia (Volume 72, Issue 277)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2023

Publication status

Published - 2023

ISSN

0004-0592

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85162128475

Abstract

SUMMARY The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of phytase and chelated minerals on performance, organs weight and bone mineralization indicators in broiler chickens. 240 male broiler chicken (Cobb 500) were evaluated in three experimental treatments (Basal diet, Basal diet + phytases and with Basal diet + chelated minerals) with 4 replicates (20 birds per replicate). The study was divided into three phases: start, growth and finisher. At the end of each phase, autopsies were performed to weigh the gastrointestinal organs and to evaluate indicators of bone mineralization of the left tibias. Significant differences (p <0.05) were found in the productive performance of chickens in favor of phytase treatment, except in feed intake (p > 0.05). Compared to control animals, the birds with phytase showed a significantly lower relative weight of the pancreas (p <0.05) and a statistically (p <0.05) greater intestine weight. Finally, at 42 days of age, statistical differences were observed in bone density (p < 0.05) and the Seedor index (p < 0.05) in favor of birds supplemented with phytase. Phytase supplementation improved the productive performance, reduced the weight of the pancreas and increased the weight of the intestine, and also increased bone mineralization, being more efficient than chelated minerals with respect to these variables.

Funding Details

The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Veterinary and Biological Science of the Universidad Cien-tífica del Sur for providing the facilities to carry out the study. This research was funded by Laboratorio Biovet S.A, Spain. The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Veterinary and Biological Science of the Universidad Científica del Sur for providing the facilities to carry out the study. This research was funded by Laboratorio Biovet S.A, Spain.
FundersFunding numbers
Faculty of Veterinary and Biological Science of the Universidad Científica del Sur
-
Laboratorio Biovet S.A
-