Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effects of an Intervention with educational phone calls to improve adherence and metabolic control in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial

Original title: Efectos de una intervención con llamadas telefónicas educativas para mejorar la adherencia y el control metabólico en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 mal controlada:Unensayoclínicoaleatorizado
  • Tania De La Cruz-Saldaña
    ,
  • María Lazo-Porras(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Ray Ticse-Aguirre
    ,
  • Dulce Morán
    ,
  • Germán Málaga
*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 438-446 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Revista del Cuerpo Medico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo (Volume 14, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2021

Publication status

Published - 10/2021

ISSN

2225-5109

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85132600505

Abstract

Introduction: Information and communication technologies can help us improve metabolic control and adherence in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). Objective: To evaluate the effects of an intervention with telephone calls in outpatients with poorly controlled DM2 in a hospital in Peru. Material and Methods: Randomized clinical trial. We included adults with DM2 with poor glycemic control, who were randomized to the control group (usual care) or to the intervention group (usual care plus a telephone intervention every two weeks for three months). The primary outcome was a ≥ 1% reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin at three months. Results: 94 participants were recruited (47 in each group). Mean age was 59.8 years (SD: 10.2), 69.2 % were women. At three months, only 14/47 participants in the control group and 13/47 participants in the intervention group had HbA1c measurement. Among these, the percentage of those who achieved a ≥ 1% decrease in HbA1c was 35,7% (5/14) in the control group and 53,8% (7/13) in the intervention group (RR: 0,72, 95% CI: 0,35-1,47). No differences were found in adherence to treatment between groups. Conclusions: No statistically significant differences were found for the outcomes of interest. This is possibly due to the low percentage of participants who were able to complete follow-up. Innovative solutions are needed to improve the control of people with DM2.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well