Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Effect of shewing stimulus and acute stress on interleukin 6, memory and spatial learning in Balb/c mice

Original title: Efecto del estímulo masticatorio y estrés agudo sobre la interleuquina 6, la memoria y el aprendizaje espacial en ratones Balb/c
  • Elías Ernesto Aguirre-Siancas(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Libertad Alzamora-Gonzales
    ,
  • Erasmo Honorio Colona-Vallejos
    ,
  • Eliberto Ruiz-Ramírez
    ,
  • Melissa Aracely Becerra-Bravo
    ,
  • Oscar Sigifredo Portilla-Flores
*Corresponding author for this work
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

Spanish

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 63-69 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Anales de la Facultad de Medicina (Volume 84, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2023

Publication status

Published - 01/2023

ISSN

1025-5583

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85160340602

Abstract

Introduction. Acute stress alters memory and spatial learning and the expression of interleukin 6, the chewing stimulus would prevent these effects. Objective. To determine the effect of chewing stimulation and acute stress on the expression of interleukin 6 and memory and spatial learning in mice. Methods. Experiment where 70 male albino mice of the Balb/c of age 2 month were randomly distributed into: Group A1: acute stress 1 hour; Group A2: acute stress 1 hour + chewing stimulus 1 hour; Group B1: acute stress 2 hours; Group B2: acute stress 2 hours + chewing stimulus 2 hours; Group C1: acute stress 3 hours; C2: acute stress 3 hours + chewing stimulus 3 hours; Group D: without intervention. For 3 days, spatial memory and learning were tested in the Morris water maze. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) was analyzed by ELISA test. Results. IL-6 was higher in the B2 group vs the other groups (p<0.0001). In addition, on the first day of evaluation, the acquisition of spatial memory and spatial was lower in the A1 vs. A2 group (p=0.042). Conclusión. Only on the first day of evaluation, we found that the masticatory stimulus prevented the decrease in memory acquisition and spatial learning in mice subjected to low-intensity acute stress. The results were generally inconclusive on the effect of masticatory stimulation. In addition, IL-6 was higher in the stress + masticatory stimulus (group B2) over the rest.