Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Differences in the prevalence of cesarean section and associated factors in private and public healthcare systems in Peru

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

100570

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare (Volume 26)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 12/2020

Publication status

Published - 12/2020

ISSN

1877-5756

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85093975635
  • PubMed: 33130536

Abstract

Background: Cesarean section rates have been steadily increasing worldwide. Private health facilities are reported as being a major contributor to this rising rate in Latin America. Aim: To assess the prevalence and determinants of cesarean section rates among public and private health facilities in Peru. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analytical study pooling the data of 52,215 women between 15 and 49 years of age from the 2015–2017 Peruvian Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES) database. Sociodemographic and pregnancy-related variables were used to construct adjusted logistic regression models for the indication of cesarean section. Findings: The prevalence of cesarean births was 73.0% (95%CI: 71.1–74.9) and 30.3% (95% CI: 29.6–31.0) in private and public health facilities, respectively. In private facilities, living in an urban area, having a higher educational level, being in the age group of 35–49 years, and having multiple pregnancies increased the probability of a cesarean section. In public health facilities, living in an urban area, having a higher wealth quintile, higher education level, older maternal age, birth order, newborn size and gender, type of pregnancy, language, and maternal height were all factors associated with cesarean section. Conclusion: The prevalence of cesarean section found in the present study was above the value recommended by the WHO (10%) for both public and private facilities. It is necessary to address the indiscriminate rise in the use of cesarean sections, developing strategies according to the type of health facility.

Funding Details

We would like to acknowledge the National Institute of Statistics and Informatics for making the dataset used in this study publicly available. Also, the authors are grateful to Elaine Pringle Donna for reviewing the language and style. ENDES is a representative national survey, and the databases are publicly accessible at the INEI website: http://iinei.inei.gob.pe/microdatos/. Since a secondary data source was used that does not include identifying data of the respondents, no approval was requested from an ethics committee. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
FundersFunding numbers
National Institute of Statistics
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
55
Citations
11

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well