Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Data sources for drug utilization research in Latin American countries—A cross-national study: DASDUR-LATAM study

  • Luciane C. Lopes(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Maribel Salas
    ,
  • Claudia Garcia Serpa Osorio-de-Castro
    ,
  • Lisiane Freitas Leal
    ,
  • Svetlana V. Doubova
    ,
  • Martín Cañás
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Sorocaba University
    ,
  • Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
    ,
  • Daiichi Sankyo (United States)
    ,
  • Centro de Integração de Dados e Conhecimentos para Saúde (Cidacs)
    ,
  • Jewish General Hospital
    ,
  • Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 343-352 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety (Volume 31, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2022

Publication status

Published - 03/2022

ISSN

1053-8569

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85122768044
  • PubMed: 34957616

Abstract

Purpose: Drug utilization research (DUR) contributes to inform policymaking and to strengthen health systems. The availability of data sources is the first step for conducting DUR. However, documents that systematize these data sources in Latin American (LatAm) countries are not known. We compiled the potential data sources for DUR in the LatAm region. Methods: A network of DUR experts from nine LatAm countries was assembled and experts conducted: (i) a website search of the government, academic, and private health institutions; (ii) screening of eligible data sources, and (iii) liaising with national experts in pharmacoepidemiology (via an online survey). The data sources were characterized by accessibility, geographic granularity, setting, sector of the data, sources and type of the data. Descriptive analyses were performed. Results: We identified 125 data sources for DUR in nine LatAm countries. Thirty-eight (30%) of them were publicly and conveniently available; 89 (71%) were accessible with limitations, and 18 (14%) were not accessible or lacked clear rules for data access. From the 125 data sources, 76 (61%) were from the public sector only; 46 (37%) were from pharmacy records; 43 (34%) came from ambulatory settings and; 85 (68%) gave access to individual patient-level data. Conclusions: Although multiple sources for DUR are available in LatAm countries, the accessibility is a major challenge. The procedures for accessing DUR data should be transparent, feasible, affordable, and protocol-driven. This inventory could permit a comparison of drug utilization between countries identifying potential medication-related problems that need further exploration.