Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Cross-cultural validation of the Jenkins Sleep Scale in Spanish-speaking countries

  • Luis Palao-Loayza
    ,
  • Daniel E. Yupanqui-Lorenzo(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Tania Arauco-Lozada
    ,
  • ,
  • Heber Domingo Seminario Ortiz
    ,
  • Marlon Elías Lobos Rivera
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad de Huelva
    ,
  • Universidad Privada del Norte
    ,
  • Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador
    ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 1521-1534 (14 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Health Psychology (Volume 30, Issue 7)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2024
  • Published - 06/2025

Publication status

Published - 06/2025

ISSN

1359-1053

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85200160779

Abstract

The study aimed to validate the Jenkins Sleep Scale (JSS-4) in six Spanish-Speaking countries. A total of 1726 people participated and were distributed between men (32.4%) and women (67.6%). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure and high reliability of the JSS-4 overall (α = 0.85, ω = 0.81) and within each country. The invariance analysis revealed that JSS-4 exhibited complete invariance across countries, thus establishing a robust foundation for inter-group comparisons. Interestingly, a comparative analysis revealed significant differences in the average levels of sleep difficulties, with particularly high rates in Spain and Chile. Item Response Theory (IRT) showed sufficient discrimination parameters for all items, and a correlation of 0.998 between Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and IRT highlighted the robustness and reliability of the results obtained. In summary, JSS-4 exhibits strong evidence of validity and consistency in measurement invariance across the six countries.