Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Course Dropout Intention Scale: Development and Validation of a New Brief Measure in Academic College Context

  • Daniel E. Yupanqui-Lorenzo
    ,
  • Lizbeth Angela Jara-Osorio
    ,
  • Carlos Carbajal-León
    ,
  • ,
  • Manuel Antonio Cardoza Sernaqué
    ,
  • Kerly Stefanny Duran Quispe
  • Universidad Privada del Norte
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
    ,
  • Universidad Privada Norbert Wiener
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola
    ,
  • Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 103-113 (11 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

European Journal of Educational Research (Volume 13, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/2024

Publication status

Published - 01/2024

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85186694115

Abstract

University students may encounter situations where they perform poorly in a course and contemplate dropping out. This intention to drop out of a course manifests not only in thoughts or ideas but also in a cognitive self-evaluation of their performance and skills, enabling them to reflect on the possibility of dropping out. In this sense, there is a shortage of instruments that evaluate the intention to drop out of a course, so the aim was to develop and validate the Course Dropout Intention Scale (CDIS). Data from two samples (N1 = 198; N2 = 675) were used; the first was for the EFA, and the second was for the CFA, GRM, and SEM. The one-factor model was derived from the EFA and confirmed in the second sample, exhibiting appropriate goodness-of-fit indices. Similarly, the GRM obtained adequate fit indices; all items discriminated adequately, and the difficulty parameter had a monotonic increase. The SEM model of the effect of satisfaction with studies on the CDIS showed a negative and statistically significant effect. Thus, it was demonstrated that the CDIS is a robust instrument in its psychometric properties and empirical evidence with other variables.