Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Coronavirus infections reported by ProMED, February 2000–January 2020

  • D. Katterine Bonilla-Aldana
    ,
  • Yeimer Holguin-Rivera
    ,
  • Isabella Cortes-Bonilla
    ,
  • María C. Cardona-Trujillo
    ,
  • Alejandra García-Barco
    ,
  • Hugo A. Bedoya-Arias
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Fundacion Universitaria Autonoma de las Américas
    ,
  • Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira
    ,
  • Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare
    ,
  • Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

101575

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease (Volume 35)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/05/2020

Publication status

Published - 01/05/2020

ISSN

1477-8939

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85079157254
  • PubMed: 32036011

Abstract

Introduction: Sources describing the global burden of emerging diseases accurately are still limited. We reviewed coronavirus infections reported by ProMED and assessed the reliability of the data retrieved compared to published reports. We evaluated the effectiveness of ProMED as a source of epidemiological data on coronavirus. Methods: Using the keyword “coronavirus” in the ProMED search engine, we reviewed all the information from the reports and collected data using a structured form, including year, country, gender, occupation, the number of infected individuals, and the number of fatal cases. Results: We identified 109 entries reported between February 29, 2000 and January 22, 2020. A total of 966 cases were reported, with death reported in 188 cases, suggesting an overall case fatality rate (CFR) of 19.5%. Of 70 cases for which the gender was reported, 47 (67.1%) were male. Most of the cases were reported from China, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, with reports from other countries, including imported cases in Europe and North America. Conclusions: Internet-based reporting systems such as ProMED are useful to gather information and synthesize knowledge on emerging infections. Although certain areas need to be improved, ProMED provided useful information about coronaviruses especially during outbreaks.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well