Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Coronally advanced flap achieved higher esthetic outcomes without a connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a 4-year randomized clinical trial

  • Stephany Gil
    ,
  • Manuel de la Rosa
    ,
  • Evelyn Mancini
    ,
  • Antonio Dias
    ,
  • Shayan Barootchi
    ,
  • Lorenzo Tavelli
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
    ,
  • AME University Monterrey
    ,
  • Private Practice
    ,
  • University of Michigan School of Dentistry
    ,
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 2727-2735 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Clinical Oral Investigations (Volume 25, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2021

Publication status

Published - 05/2021

ISSN

1432-6981

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85091420357
  • PubMed: 32974775

Abstract

Objectives: Limited long-term data are available when comparing the esthetic outcomes of coronally advanced flap (CAF) with or without a connective tissue graft (CTG). The aim of this study was to compare the 4-year esthetic outcomes of CAF vs CAF + CTG for the treatment of isolated maxillary gingival recessions. Material and methods: Forty-eight patients were randomly assigned for treatment either with CAF (control; N = 24) or to CAF + CTG (test group; N = 24). Patients were followed after the surgery until the final evaluation. A professional esthetic evaluation was performed using the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES). Recession reduction, mean root coverage, and complete root coverage were also evaluated. Results: Forty-two patients completed the study at the 4-year recall. A significant recession reduction was evident at 4 years, without significant intergroup differences. The CAF group showed a statistically significant higher final RES compared with the CAF + CTG group (9.14 ± 1.08 vs 7.25 ± 1.29, respectively, p < 0.001). Regarding the individual components of RES, gingival margin and marginal tissue contour were significantly higher in the CAF group compared with that in the CAF + CTG group. Conclusions: CAF presented with a significantly higher overall esthetic score than CAF + CTG, and in the individual RES components of marginal tissue contour and gingival margin after 4 years. Clinical relevance: CAF without the addition of CTG provided higher esthetic outcomes for the treatment of isolated gingival recessions.

Funding Details

The work was supported by the Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
FundersFunding numbers
Department of Periodontology
-
School of Dentistry, Universidad Científica del Sur
-