Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Concordance of the facial biotype between Bjork-Jarabak cephalometrics and photographic analysis of the facial opening angle

  • Ana Flavia Medina-Grandez
    ,
  • Luciana Llontop-Palma
    ,
  • Gustavo Armando Ruíz-Mora
    ,
  • Yalil Augusto Ro-Dríguez-Cárdenas
    ,
  • Aron Aliaga Del Castillo
    ,
  • Vinicius Dutra
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages e454-8

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (Volume 15, Issue 6)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 2023

Publication status

Published - 2023

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85163321876

Abstract

Background: Analysis of the facial biotype can provide useful information for orthodontic diagnosis and can deter-mine the type of growth of a patient to guide orthodontic treatment. The objective of this study was to determine the concordance of the facial biotype according to Bjork-Jarabak cephalometric analysis and photographic analysis of the angle of facial opening in Peruvian individuals. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 244 cephalometric radiographs and frontal photographs of the same patients obtained from a database. The facial biotype (mesofacial, brachyfacial, or dolichofacial) was determined with the Bjork-Jarabak polygon (cephalometric) and the angle of facial opening (photographic). Two trained investigators performed all the measurements. The concordance of the facial diagnosis was determined using correlations of the interclass coefficient and the kappa test. p<0.05 Results: In cases with a mesofacial biotype, both analyses coincided in 60 individuals (68.2%), while in those diag-nosed with a dolichofacial biotype, the analyses only coincided in 17 individuals (10.4%). There was no concordan-ce between the two methods regarding the brachyfacial biotype since according to the angle of facial opening none of the individuals presented a brachyfacial biotype (kappa weighted test= 0.020, p=0.586). Conclusions: Cephalometric and photographic analyses should be complementary and one should not substitute the other. Attention should be focused on dolichofacial and brachyfacial biotypes, which showed less concordance between evaluations. So, more studies are needed to follow this line of research.

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
28
Citations
2