Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparison of two models of surgical care for patients with cleft lip and palate in resource-challenged settings

  • Percy Rossell-Perry
    ,
  • ,
  • Lorgio Salas-Bustinza
    ,
  • Omar Cotrina-Rabanal
  • Universidad de San Martin de Porres
    ,
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
    ,
  • Hospital Nuñez Butron
    ,
  • ARMONIZAR Foundation
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 47-53 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

World Journal of Surgery (Volume 39, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 01/01/2015

Publication status

Published - 01/01/2015

ISSN

0364-2313

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84928169870
  • PubMed: 24357243

Abstract

Background The Peruvian health system is limited in providing specialized care for patients with clefts because there are an insufficient number of hospitals and few specially trained doctors in rural areas of the country. The most common model of care in these areas is the surgical mission wherein experienced cleft surgeons perform surgeries and teach local doctors. The purpose of this research was to identify the differences in outcome between the surgical mission trip and the referral center model of care provided by the same team. Methods A retrospective analysis (2002-2012) was performed on data from surgical outcomes provided by the Outreach Surgical Center Lima that utilized both models of care (surgical mission and referral center).Atotal of 935 procedures were performed in 680 patientswith clefts whowere treated by the Outreach Surgical Center Program Lima since 2002. atients in both groups were identified from our records (medical records and screening-day registries). All patients underwent a physical examination, had photographs taken, and any unfavorable results and complications were documented. omparison of categorical variables (including outcomes) between caremodels was performed using Pearson's v2 test or Fisher's exact test when appropriate. In all cases a two-tailed test was performed and the p value for rejecting the null hypothesis (no difference or no association) was set at 0.05. esults We found significant differences between the two models of care with respect to unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate dehiscence (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04, respectively), palate postoperative hemorrhage (p < 0.01), and palatal fistula (p < 0.01) outcomes. Discussion Differences in observed surgical outcomes between the two models might be attributed to the surgeon's performance and/or the patient's age, and these factors are also considered with respect to the model of care. Limitations in long-term medical evaluation at each site should be identified and strategies to improve surgical outcomes must be developed to ensure that patients served by surgical missions obtain the same results achieved at a referral center.

Funding Details

Cleft lip and palate are a common deformity disease in Peru [, ]. Our health system is limited in providing specialized care for these patients because there are not enough hospitals and few specially trained doctors in the rural areas of the country. Since the 1960s, international teams have been providing free cleft care for these patients. The model of care during those years was the surgical mission whereby experienced cleft surgeons performed surgeries and taught local doctors. Since 1999, Interplast (now ReSurge International), in association with The Smile Train, had local teams as Incubator Programs (in 2003 the name changed to Outreach Surgical Center Programs) in seven countries around the world []. Based on a new philosophical model (observation, integration, and independence), ReSurge International embarked on a program that guaranteed patient safety, preserved indigenous culture, and taught local surgeons the multidisciplinary approach to cleft care []. These programs received medical support from ReSurge and financial support from Smile Train to provide free cleft surgeries for the needy and underserved.