Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli isolates from two paediatric cohort studies in Lima, Peru

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt
    ,
  • ,
  • Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
    ,
  • Hospital Clínic – Universitat de Barcelona
    ,
  • U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6
    ,
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 493-502 (10 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (Volume 109, Issue 8)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 30/03/2015

Publication status

Published - 30/03/2015

ISSN

0035-9203

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84939480922
  • PubMed: 26175267

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, being of special concern in low-and middle-income countries. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility and mechanisms of resistance in 205 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates from two cohort studies in children <24 months in Lima, Peru. Methods: ETEC were identified by an in-house multiplex real-time PCR. Susceptibility to 13 antimicrobial agents was tested by disk diffusion; mechanisms of resistance were evaluated by PCR. Results: ETEC isolates were resistant to ampicillin (64%), cotrimoxazole (52%), tetracycline (37%); 39% of the isolates were multidrug-resistant. Heat-stable toxin producing (ETEC-st) (48%) and heat-labile toxin producing ETEC (ETEC-lt) (40%) had higher rates of multidrug resistance than isolates producing both toxins (ETEC-lt-st) (21%), p<0.05. Only 10% of isolates were resistant to nalidixic acid and none to ciprofloxacin or cefotaxime. Ampicillin and sulfamethoxazole resistance were most often associated with blaTEM (69%) and sul2 genes (68%), respectively. Tetracycline resistance was associated with tet(A) (49%) and tet(B) (39%) genes. Azithromycin inhibitory diameters were ≤15 mm in 36% of isolates, with 5% of those presenting the mph(A) gene. Conclusions: ETEC from Peruvian children are often resistant to older, inexpensive antibiotics, while remaining susceptible to ciprofloxacin, cephalosporins and furazolidone. Fluoroquinolones and azithromycin remain the drugs of choice for ETEC infections in Peru. However, further development of resistance should be closely monitored.

Funding Details

FundersFunding numbers
NICHD
R01HD051716
NICHD
-

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
Citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Social media
6
Captures
115
Citations
18

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well