Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Combining cash transfers and cognitive behavioral therapy to reduce antisocial behavior in young men: A mediation analysis of a randomized controlled trial in Liberia

  • Marina Xavier Carpena
    ,
  • Cristiane Silvestre Paula
    ,
  • ,
  • Philipp Hessel
    ,
  • Mauricio Avendano
    ,
  • Sara Evans-Lacko
Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Publication Information

Output type

Research Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English

Article number

e0273891

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

PLoS ONE (Volume 18, Issue 3 March)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 03/2023

Publication status

Published - 03/2023

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85150288310

Abstract

Background Interventions that combine cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) with unconditional cash transfers (UCT) reduce the risk of antisocial behavior (ASB), but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. In this paper, we test the role of psychological and cognitive mechanisms in explaining this effect. We assessed the mediating role of executive function, self-control, and time preferences. Methods We used data from the Sustainable Transformation of Youth in Liberia, a community-based randomized controlled trial of criminally engaged men. The men were randomized into: Group-1: control (n = 237); and Group-2: CBT+UCT (n = 207). ASB was measured 12 13 months after the interventions were completed, and the following mediators were assessed 2 5 weeks later: (i) self-control, (ii) time preferences and (iii) executive functions. We estimated the natural direct effect (NDE) and the natural indirect effect (NIE) of the intervention over ASB. Results Self-control, time preferences and a weighted index of all three mediators were associated with ASB scores, but the intervention influenced time preferences only [B = 0.09 95%CI (0.03; 0.15)]. There was no evidence that the effect of the intervention on ASB was mediated by self-control [BNIE = 0.007 95%CI (-0.01; 0.02)], time preferences [BNIE =-0.02 95%CI (-0.05; 0.01)], executive functions [BNIE = 0.002 95%CI (-0.002; 0.006)] or the weighted index of the mediators [BNIE =-0.0005 95%CI (-0.03; 0.02)]. Conclusions UCT and CBT lead to improvements in ASB, even in the absence of mediation via psychological and cognitive functions. Findings suggest that the causal mechanisms may involve non-psychological pathways.

Funding Details

Funding:ThisstudyisanoutputoftheCHANCES-6study.ThisworkwassupportedbytheUKRI’s GlobalChallengesResearchFund(ES/S001050/1). ThesupportoftheEconomicandSocialResearch Council(ESRC)isgratefullyacknowledged.CSP receivedsupportfromCAPES/PRINTgrantnumber 88887.310343/2018-00andFundoMackpesquisa. CSPandSE-LreceivedagrantfromNewton funding,grantnumber:NAFR12\1020;MC,CSP, andSE-L,andreceivedagrantfromtheEconomic andSocialResearchCouncilfortheCHANCES-6 project(ESRC,ES/S001050/1);CSPandAMhave bolsaprodutividadeempesquisafromtheBrazilian NationalCouncilforScientificandTechnological Development(ConselhoNacionalde Desenvolvimento Cientı ´ fico e Tecnolo ´ gico – CNPq). CSPwaspartiallyfundedbytheCAPES Coordenac ¸ãodeAperfeic ¸oamentodePessoalde Nı ´ vel Superior, Programa Institucional de Internacionalizac ¸ão(CAPES/PrInt),grantnumber 88887.696831/2022-00.Thefundershadnorolein studydesign,datacollectionandanalysis,decision topublish,orpreparationofthemanuscript.